Startups would hit Series B and invest heavily in building content moats with aggressive velocity.
I worked with content teams publishing an average of 100 blog posts monthly, with 40-50 writers on payroll.
One SaaS company published 1,000 blog posts, and everybody clapped. We wrote case studies about it and called them visionary because they dominated Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs) and drove a ton of traffic.
These companies scaled quickly, covering entire topic clusters in weeks, whether or not those topics were relevant to their product.
The goal was coverage, always more coverage, and if we’re honest, we didn’t create that content for the user; we created it for SEO.
Google claims to prioritize quality over optimization, but I can cite countless examples that show otherwise.
I suspect Google never had a reliable way to evaluate quality. Instead, it leaned on traffic and engagement as measured in Chrome, and vanity signals SEOs could easily manipulate.
Great content was never enough. You had to:
Nearly everything we did for on-page SEO was unnatural and detrimental to the user experience. It felt like a rat race to the bottom, and the user paid the price.
Google prioritized brand recognition over quality, and the only way to gain popularity was through volume…hence, the bloated content clusters.
If you liked Should We Stop Creating Informational Content? by Chima Mmeje Then you'll love Miami SEO Expert
How to build a brand-led content strategy that drives demand outside searchYou’ll learn to move…
Five years after this video was created, the idea that machine learning might be “far…
I’ve spent the past year fielding the same panicked question from clients repeatedly: “Why is traffic…
Claim and Verify All Listings with a Domain EmailWe all know how to claim and verify…
When Teal brought me in, their bottom-of-funnel content was barely moving the needle. Blog posts…
Clicks are down, and if you’re working in SEO right now, you’re probably stuck trying…