To better understand Google’s current capabilities, we compared the queries to organic result titles (as displayed by Google, not <title> tags) using three metrics: (1) exact-match*, (2) partial match with Jaccard similarity, and (3) semantic match with cosine similarity.
1. Exact-match*
Exact-match is pretty self-explanatory, but we chose to be a bit forgiving, normalizing case and punctuation, removing plurals, and allowing any title that contained the full query.
2. Jaccard similarity
To analyze partial matches, we used Jaccard similarity, which measures the number of shared elements (in this case, words) across two sets vs. the unique elements of both sets. Put simply, it’s the proportion of shared words across the two strings to the total, unique words. This is measured on a 0.0-1.0 scale.
3. Cosine similarity
Finally, we calculated vector embeddings and cosine similarity between the two strings. This captures semantic relationships – in a word, “meaning.” Specifically, we used 768-dimensional Nomic embeddings. Cosine similarity also measures similarity on a 0.0-1.0 scale. Let’s look at the stats and some examples.
If you liked How Much Do Keywords Matter in 2026? by Dr. Peter J. Meyers Then you'll love Miami SEO Expert
So if it doesn't, then, for example, we might have a query, like "write me…
Now we're going to make this pretty. Formatting matters because humans need content they can scan…
And now, finally, invest in influence optimization.I saved my favorite for last. What this means…
So, this line chart, I've just picked out three features. I think we have more…
Only 1 in 10 AI citations match the exact URLs in Google’s top 10 organic…
So moving on to the first key advantage, it's actually free to set up this…