To better understand Google’s current capabilities, we compared the queries to organic result titles (as displayed by Google, not <title> tags) using three metrics: (1) exact-match*, (2) partial match with Jaccard similarity, and (3) semantic match with cosine similarity.
1. Exact-match*
Exact-match is pretty self-explanatory, but we chose to be a bit forgiving, normalizing case and punctuation, removing plurals, and allowing any title that contained the full query.
2. Jaccard similarity
To analyze partial matches, we used Jaccard similarity, which measures the number of shared elements (in this case, words) across two sets vs. the unique elements of both sets. Put simply, it’s the proportion of shared words across the two strings to the total, unique words. This is measured on a 0.0-1.0 scale.
3. Cosine similarity
Finally, we calculated vector embeddings and cosine similarity between the two strings. This captures semantic relationships – in a word, “meaning.” Specifically, we used 768-dimensional Nomic embeddings. Cosine similarity also measures similarity on a 0.0-1.0 scale. Let’s look at the stats and some examples.
If you liked How Much Do Keywords Matter in 2026? by Dr. Peter J. Meyers Then you'll love Miami SEO Expert
1. Consider specifying locations or personasSo one of the big ones that you could play…
1. SemanticSo number 1, semantic. This is obviously one we're very familiar with from conventional…
Avoid prompts that create false positivesSeparate prompts into three types: branded, comparison, and non-branded.Branded prompts…
So even brands that have made their name synonymous with a product will not be…
The model breaks visibility into four quadrants:Open areas known to your brand and customersHidden areas…
So if it doesn't, then, for example, we might have a query, like "write me…